Bakers Street to Morton Pinkney - request for info - The SMJ Society2024-03-29T11:18:18Zhttps://thesmjr.ning.com/forum/topics/bakers-street-to-morton?commentId=3138568%3AComment%3A8208&x=1&feed=yes&xn_auth=noFurther thoughts on the Met l…tag:thesmjr.ning.com,2010-07-15:3138568:Comment:82082010-07-15T11:04:06.000ZRobin Culluphttps://thesmjr.ning.com/profile/RobinCullup
Further thoughts on the Met link from Quainton to Moreton Pinkney - the Metropolitan Railway proposal of 30th Nov 1889 was not passed as already stated, but appears to have been the work of the same engineer who was named in the M,S & L scheme of 1893 (i.e. the London Extension), and both schemes seem to utilise the same route between Quainton and Moreton Pinkney - so did Charles Liddell - engineer - get paid twice for the same work?<br />
There's further reading on this matter in Vol 2 of Geoge…
Further thoughts on the Met link from Quainton to Moreton Pinkney - the Metropolitan Railway proposal of 30th Nov 1889 was not passed as already stated, but appears to have been the work of the same engineer who was named in the M,S & L scheme of 1893 (i.e. the London Extension), and both schemes seem to utilise the same route between Quainton and Moreton Pinkney - so did Charles Liddell - engineer - get paid twice for the same work?<br />
There's further reading on this matter in Vol 2 of Geoge Dow's "Great Central" (page 246 onwards).<br />
Fascinating proposals of what might have been.<br />
<br />
Robin Although it is not very detai…tag:thesmjr.ning.com,2010-07-12:3138568:Comment:82062010-07-12T20:18:34.000ZTony Newmanhttps://thesmjr.ning.com/xn/detail/u_14hv6ehif9n9b
Although it is not very detailed, there is a map of the proposed route on page 96 of Clive Foxell's <i>Memories of the Met & GC Joint</i> Line. (2002).
Although it is not very detailed, there is a map of the proposed route on page 96 of Clive Foxell's <i>Memories of the Met & GC Joint</i> Line. (2002). Dick,
You may find a publica…tag:thesmjr.ning.com,2010-07-12:3138568:Comment:82032010-07-12T16:53:41.000ZRobin Culluphttps://thesmjr.ning.com/profile/RobinCullup
Dick,<br />
<br />
You may find a publication by Northamptonshire Record Office helpful - this is a "Catalogue of Plans of Proposed canals, Turnpike Roads, Railways etc 1792 - 1960" first published in 2000. It's available form the Record Office at Wootton Park - £9.95.<br />
<br />
In it there are 10 schemes or plans that mention Moreton Pinkney, but the one which concerns you particularly is No. 203 in the book which dates from 30th Nov 1889 and is deposited by Charles Liddel, engineer on behalf of the Metropolitan…
Dick,<br />
<br />
You may find a publication by Northamptonshire Record Office helpful - this is a "Catalogue of Plans of Proposed canals, Turnpike Roads, Railways etc 1792 - 1960" first published in 2000. It's available form the Record Office at Wootton Park - £9.95.<br />
<br />
In it there are 10 schemes or plans that mention Moreton Pinkney, but the one which concerns you particularly is No. 203 in the book which dates from 30th Nov 1889 and is deposited by Charles Liddel, engineer on behalf of the Metropolitan Railway. This has all sorts of proposed routes - 6 in all - not just the line from Quainton, but also joining up at Helmdon on the Northampton & Banbury, and also the Banbury of the LNWR branch at Evenley.<br />
<br />
Presumably the detailed plans can be examined at the Record Office - could be an interesting exercise.<br />
<br />
Hope this helps.<br />
<br />
Robin Would it have been any sort o…tag:thesmjr.ning.com,2010-07-12:3138568:Comment:82002010-07-12T08:05:49.000ZPeter Fleminghttps://thesmjr.ning.com/profile/PeterFleming
Would it have been any sort of achievement for Morton Pinkney to have become a second Verney Junction?<br />
<br />
Pullman trains did run to Verney Junction, unlikely though that seems. This may have been because the chairman of the Met Railway lived nearby so effectively had his own personal service.<br />
<br />
There may have been personal reasons that lead to the new line to be built via Princes Risborough but practical reasons were surely more important: the Met line south of Aylesbury was just too overloaded.…
Would it have been any sort of achievement for Morton Pinkney to have become a second Verney Junction?<br />
<br />
Pullman trains did run to Verney Junction, unlikely though that seems. This may have been because the chairman of the Met Railway lived nearby so effectively had his own personal service.<br />
<br />
There may have been personal reasons that lead to the new line to be built via Princes Risborough but practical reasons were surely more important: the Met line south of Aylesbury was just too overloaded. Ironically this new fast line seemed to become redundant even earlier than the rest of the GCR and the line from Ashendon Junction to Grendon Junction was closed before my time, probbaly when the Sheffield expresses ended. I have always understod that…tag:thesmjr.ning.com,2010-07-12:3138568:Comment:81972010-07-12T07:09:11.000ZDavid Blagrovehttps://thesmjr.ning.com/profile/DavidBlagrove
I have always understod that both Bell and Pollitt were proteges of Sir Edward Watkin back in MS&L days, who disliked one another. Sir Edward had kept them in order but by the time that the GCR was built Sir Edward had been forced to take a back seat due to ill health. Certainly the bit about the Metropolitan causing the GC/GW Joint line to be built rings true, although the Met route via Aylesbury was not suitable for the sort of high speed running that the GC desired. The first train from…
I have always understod that both Bell and Pollitt were proteges of Sir Edward Watkin back in MS&L days, who disliked one another. Sir Edward had kept them in order but by the time that the GCR was built Sir Edward had been forced to take a back seat due to ill health. Certainly the bit about the Metropolitan causing the GC/GW Joint line to be built rings true, although the Met route via Aylesbury was not suitable for the sort of high speed running that the GC desired. The first train from Woodford over the new "London Extension" was a GCR coal train which, on reaching the jubnction with the Met north of Quainton Road, was prevented from proceeding further, presumably on Bell's orders. The train then had to beat an ignominious retreat, brake van first, to Woodford, since there was no means of running the engine round the train on GC property at Quainton Road.<br />
<br />
I also understand that the Met used to run Pullman cars from Baker Street for businessmen from Buckinghamshire who commuted to London and that these were worked as far north as Verney Junction. I have seen a picture somewhere of one of the Met 4-4-4T engines standing in a bay at Verney Junction. It is not therefore surprising that the Met might have had designs on Moreton Pinkney, since the E&WJR and its extension to Broom would have given it a potential route to Birmingham (New Street). Such a situation would definitely not have appealed to the GWR, who also had a distinctly rocky relationship with the Metropolitan dating back to braod gauge days and quite probably went a long way towards their decision to join forces with the GC over the line through High Wycombe and Princes Risborough. The Pullman service to Verney Junction may very well have been part of the Met's kite-flying, but I can't believe that that Company would have been satisfied with a terminal either in deepest Bucks or rural Northants. Surely Birmingham was the ultimate aim.<br />
<br />
Mind you, from the point of view of historical modellers, a Peter Denny-type layout based on an augmented Moreton Pinkney with Metropolitan stock meeting E&WJR stock (both not often modelled) and possible links with the MS&LR via Leicester and Rugby anf the GWR via Banbury would be an intriguing model project!