‘The Stratford Upon Avon & Midland Junction Railway’ (or S.M.J.) was a small independent railway company which ran a line across the empty, untouched centre of England. It visited the counties of Northamptonshire, Warwickshire, Oxfordshire and a little of Buckinghamshire, only existing as the SMJ from 1909 to 1923. In 1923 the S.M.J.became a minor arm of the London Midland and Scottish (L.M.S.), then in 1948 'British Railways' 

Gone but not forgotten: "the damsel is not dead, but sleepeth"


SMJ Forum

Video: Stratford-upon-Avon to Towcester

I have added a video to the site's video page.https://youtu.be/DHCoijWc_t0Continue

Tags: video

Started by Graham Ward Jul 28.

Binton Station

As I was in the vicinity this week I visited my old stamping ground of over sixty years ago, the former SMJ station at Binton. The former goods shed has been demolished, 24 upmarket dwellings have been constructed in the old yard and the former…Continue

Started by Paul Stratford Apr 23.

Would the GCR have gone via Towcester? 14 Replies

Looking through Mac Hawkins book on the GCR then and now, he mentions that the GCR were thinking of running a line connecting Brackley to Northampton and had provisionally made a mound ready for a platform to be later constructed but they dropped…Continue

Started by Gary. Last reply by Andrew Emmerson Apr 18.

EWJR Portland Cement Wagon 13 Replies

Hello All,I found this item on ebay, although it's a model, what I'd like to know is, was it actually based on the real thing? As you can see it has the initials EWJR and return empty to Ettington, which all fits in with the real world.It was listed…Continue

Started by Jim Goodman. Last reply by Jim Goodman Apr 18.

SMJ photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

I recently acquired a bundle of railway related papers, amongst which is a1955-6 BTC application to Parliament for various powers to construct works etc. Most are related to docks and waterways, but buried in the middle are a couple of references to the SMJ line.

One is obvious - the new curve at Stratford - although it is interesting to note that the process started as early as 1955-6, and also that the Honeybourne line is still referred to as the "Oxford, Worcester & Wolverhampton Railway" !

The other is a little more obscure.

It refers to a "widening on the north east side of the bridge in the parish of Fenny Compton in the rural district of Southam carrying the railway between Broom and Byfield over the road leading from Fenny Compton to Byfield"

It's obvious which bridge this is, but does anyone know the nature of the work and why it was carried out?

Possibly it is something to do with the WR loop line, although the north east side of the bridge seems the wrong side for this.

Interestingly, there is no mention of the other works at Fenny to provide the through junction onto the SMJ which opened in 1960, along with the Stratford curve.

Possibly this did not need approval as it was wholly on railway owned land, and only involved track realignment.

Any thoughts?

Views: 235

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The bridge widening was because the crossing loop was to be considerably extended (towards Kineton) and a third track - Up Reception Loop - added.

The new running junction - for the iron ore trains from Banbury OIC to south Wales - merely replaced the previous back-shunt siding connection between the two railways, within their existing limits of deviation thus needing no parliamentary powers.

You can see this from Tony Cooke's "Track Layout Diagrams of the GWR", Section 29, which covers the whole SMJ (third edition, 1994) - out of print but you might pick it up through second hand dealers (try Googling it...).


Many thanks for this - I should have realised the answer myself, but for some reason in my haste I overlooked the fact that there were in essence two bridges, and not one, under the line !!

I was therefore concentrating on the description "north east side" and expecting the widening to be over on the GW line.

A quick look at various photos showed the changes in the bridge over the SMJ line - quite obvious really.

Reply to Discussion


© 2021   Created by Andy Thompson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service